Results
| Results1,2 | Description |
| $1,500,000 | Secured a pre-judgment writ of attachment against three borrowers who had borrowed money from a client. Obtaining a pre-judgment writ of attachment is rare; the attachment of assets led to repayment of most of the debt.
|
| $1,400,0003 | To our knowledge, this is one of the largest out-of-court settlements for a burn injury caused by the accidental spilling of a hot liquid.
|
| $727,0004 | A young child accidentally ran through an unglazed glass door causing partial nerve damage and major scarring.
|
| $500,000 | Secured a pre-judgment writ of attachment against a business partner who misled the client about the allocation of funds intended for their joint venture.
|
| $250,000 | Elderly woman suffered a broken leg at a nursing home. After taking over the case from the client’s previous attorney, within weeks our attorneys secured compensation for our client.
|
| $250,000 | The claimant suffered some loss of his sense of taste after taking a popular over-the-counter medication. Following our referral to a fellow colleague, the client received one of the largest out-of-court settlements for injury resulting from use of this product.
|
| $175,000 | Claimant was the victim of a defective cochlear implant. She had no economic damages and the replacement of her implant was successful. This is a sizable settlement given the lack of economic damages and the absence of long-term harm.
|
| $195,000 | During a “company retreat,” heavy drinking and a party-atmosphere led to sexually charged comments and behavior towards the client.
|
| $195,000 | Our client worked as an administrative manager within a law enforcement agency. Her superior acted inappropriately towards her.
|
| $99,000 | Employee was demoted following complaints that his employer was violating the law. While the economic impact of the demotion was small, we convinced the defendant that a jury would sympathize with our client and award him emotional injury damages. The client wanted to avoid a jury trial against his current employer that would have involved forcing his co-workers to testify on his behalf. |
- 1 For client privacy, we have omitted names and case numbers.
- 1 These results are not a guarantee of any future outcome. Every case is unique and depends on the outcome of many variables.
- 3 This is the total structured settlement value.
- 4 This is the total structured settlement value.
